Which states require new handgun models to have microstamping technology?
2 states have adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Alabama has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Alaska has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Arizona has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Arkansas has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
California has adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Colorado has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Connecticut has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Delaware has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Florida has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Georgia has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Hawaii has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Idaho has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Illinois has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Indiana has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Iowa has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Kansas has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Kentucky has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Louisiana has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Maine has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Maryland has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Massachusetts has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Michigan has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Minnesota has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Mississippi has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Missouri has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Montana has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Nebraska has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Nevada has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
New Hampshire has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
New Jersey has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
New Mexico has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
New York has adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
North Carolina has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
North Dakota has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Ohio has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Oklahoma has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Oregon has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Pennsylvania has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Rhode Island has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
South Carolina has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
South Dakota has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Tennessee has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Texas has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Utah has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Vermont has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Virginia has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Washington has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
West Virginia has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Wisconsin has not adopted this policy
Microstamping for New Handguns
Wyoming has not adopted this policy
What It Does
For decades, manufacturers have refused to build basic ballistics identification features into their guns—including microstamping technology, which marks bullets and cartridge cases with a unique fingerprint each time a firearm is discharged. California bars the sale of any new models that are not “microstamp-ready,” models that enable law enforcement who recover ballistics at the scene of a shooting to immediately identify the gun used to commit the crime. Despite California’s law, gunmakers continue to resist adding microstamping features to the firing pins of their guns—even though they have admitted in court filings that it is technically feasible to do.
The Impact
Violent crime clearance rates have been decreasing across US cities since 2010. In 2020, 45.6 percent of reported murders and non-negligent homicides and 53.6 percent of aggravated assaults went unsolved. When aggravated assaults involve guns, they’re cleared at lower rates than when they involve any other means. We must give law enforcement all the tools needed to bring justice to victims and survivors.
Source: Cal. Penal Code § 31910; NY Executive Law 837-w, NY Penal Code § 265.38.
Motion to Dismiss: Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Renna v. Becerra, No. 3:20-cv-02190-DMS-DEB (S.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2021), ECF. No. 12, from at https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18619597/renna/.
Clearance rates: Federal Bureau of Investigation, “Table 26 – Percent of Offenses Cleared by Arrest or Exceptional Means by Geographic Region and Division, 2020,” accessed January 19, 2022. Not all law enforcement agencies report data to the FBI.
