Paranoia and Profit: Armed Extremism and the Gun Industry’s Role in Fostering It

Meanwhile, the industry works with its political allies to make these weapons available to anyone, anywhere, at any time, demonizing those who want to keep firearms out of the hands of dangerous people as agents of the supposed threats facing American society (e.g. “‘they’ are coming to take your guns”). Those demonizing messages are often integrated into the extremist worldview, creating connective tissue between extremist movements and the gun lobby: those who believe in the demonizing conspiracy theories pushed by the gun lobby may be primed to believe in other conspiracy theories, and vice versa.

Guns are not ancillary tools to extremist movements in America; instead, guns undergird many of the movements’ organizational and philosophical foundations. The increasing convergence of these movements is alarming and yet the leaders of the gun lobby have continued to encourage it.

In this time of particular political uncertainty the U.S. still faces a confluence of dangerous challenges from white supremacists, anti-government militias, and other armed groups and individuals of the extreme right that seek to perpetrate violence, spread conspiracy theories, traffic in hate speech, and engage in armed intimidation.  The current risk of political violence is high.  

This report builds on Everytown’s research on armed extremism to provide new insights and data about the current threat and the under-appreciated nexus between the gun lobby, gun industry, and far-right extremist movements.

Section I defines the threat and lays out the stakes. Section II examines how the gun lobby and gun industry fan the flames of extremist ideology, creating a type of feedback loop of conspiracy, distrust in institutions, and a perpetual need for more and more guns. Section III provides evidence that guns remain the tool of choice for extremists, from recent extremist attacks, arrest data, and armed demonstrations.

---

I. The Persistent Threat From Armed Extremism

A. What Is Armed Extremism?

Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund (“Everytown”) uses the term “armed extremism” in work exploring the intersection of extremist ideologies and guns. It refers to the use of firearms, most often by groups on the extreme right, to intimidate, silence, or injure others in the name of ideology.

Guns and gun rights are central to many extreme right groups and individuals. Everytown’s 2020 report on the historical connection between gun rights and extremism, entitled “Armed & Dangerous: How the Gun Lobby Enshrines Guns as Tools of the Extreme Right,” concluded that the toxic mix of conspiracy theories, guns, and far-right extremism around the 2020 election would likely serve as an accelerant for extreme right violence in the United States. Indeed, an unprecedented undermining of political and institutional legitimacy by elected leaders reinforced far-right conspiracy theories that have been amplified by the gun lobby for years. 

The January 6, 2021 insurrection opened the eyes of the world to the growing threat of extremism in the United States. As discussed in a later section, the attack on the U.S. Capitol is the most glaring—but far from the only—demonstration of the danger armed extremism poses to our democracy. But from a broader lens, January 6 was a culmination of decades of extreme right conspiracy theories such as the supposedly looming threat of government authoritarianism and mass confiscation of guns that resulted in a belief that the democratic transfer of power was in fact a ruse that warranted taking up arms against the government. 

As Everytown has previously documented, firearms and related conspiracy theories have been central to the ideology and strategies of extreme right groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. While these extremist groups have not disbanded, many of their leaders have been convicted of felonies (including, in some cases, seditious conspiracy) relating to January 6 and face significant prison time. These specific groups’ public and digital footprint appear smaller now than in the weeks leading up to the January 6 insurrection. 

However, the diminishment of these groups does not mean the threat has abated. In fact, research has shown that the majority of those arrested in connection with January 6 were not necessarily members of such large established extremist organizations¹George Washington Program on Extremism, “‘This Is Our House!’ A Preliminary Assessment of the Capitol Hill Siege Participants,” March 2021.; Jensen, Michael. “Perspective | It Wasn’t Just Proud Boys. Interconnected Extremists Converged on Jan. 6.” Washington Post, June 17, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/06/17/january-6-hearings-extremists-proud-boys/, suggesting that the diminution of specific groups does not spell the end of this kind of extremist threat. Far-right propaganda and radicalizing conspiracy theories are once again taking center stage in our national discourse. Furthermore, white supremacist violence remains a pressing issue, as evidenced by mass shootings in recent years in Buffalo, New York; Allen, Texas; and Jacksonville, Florida. Violent misogyny is also a longstanding threat, as profiled in Everytown’s report “Misogyny, Extremism, and Gun Violence.” 

Government and national security experts continue to warn of the threat.

• In September 2019, for the first time since its inception, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) named white supremacist extremism “one of the most potent forces driving domestic terrorism” in the United States.²Department of Homeland Security, “Strategic Framework for Countering Terrorism and Targeted Violence,” September 2019. Two months later, FBI Director Christopher Wray testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs that domestic terrorism posed a “serious, persistent threat,” and that the FBI’s investigations into domestic, racially motivated extremist attacks conclude that the majority are “fueled by some kind of white supremacy.”³“National Security Threats | C-SPAN.Org,” November 5, 2019, https://www.c-span.org/video/?466018-1/national-security-threats. Comments begin at 39 minutes into recorded testimony.
• A March 2021 unclassified report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence indicated that lone domestic violent extremists “will continue to pose significant detection and disruption challenges because of their capacity for independent radicalization to violence, ability to mobilize discreetly, and access to firearms.”⁴National Security Threats | C-SPAN.Org.” Comments begin at 39 minutes into recorded testimony; “FBI Oversight Hearing | February 5, 2020 | C-SPAN.Org,” accessed August 31, 2023, https://www.c-span.org/video/?468923-1/fbi-oversight-hearing; Office of the Director of National Intelligence, “Domestic Violent Extremism Poses Heightened Threat in 2021,” March 1, 2021.
• In October 2022, the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, U.S. Capitol Police, and National Counterterrorism Center released a joint bulletin warning of election-related domestic violent extremism.⁵Geneva Sands and Sean Lyngaas, “Feds Warn That Domestic Violent Extremists Pose Heightened Threat to Midterm Elections,” October 28, 2022, https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/28/politics/midterm-domestic-extremist-threat/index.html. It read, in part, “Following the 2022 midterm election, perceptions of election-related fraud and dissatisfaction with electoral outcomes likely will result in heightened threats of violence against a broad range of targets―such as ideological opponents and election workers.”⁶Sands and Lyngaas.
• A May 2023 bulletin from the Department of Homeland Security’s National Terrorism Advisory System further warned of the heightened threat environment due to “[b]oth domestic violent extremists (DVEs) and those associated with foreign terrorist organizations.”⁷Department of Homeland Security, “National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin,” May 24, 2023, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/ntas/alerts/23_0524_S1_NTAS-Bulletin-508.pdf. The bulletin specifically noted, “Likely targets of potential violence include US critical infrastructure, faith-based institutions, individuals or events associated with the LGBTQIA+ community, schools, racial and ethnic minorities, and government facilities and personnel, including law enforcement.”⁸Department of Homeland Security.

B. The Impact of Armed Extremism and Hate-Motivated Violence Is Felt Throughout Targeted Communities

The impact of armed extremist violence or demonstrations of force reverberates beyond the individual community where it occurs. Given the centrality of ideology to armed extremist groups and armed extremist violence, this is often the intended result of extremist attacks and intimidation. 

This is especially true for extremist attacks that are borne out of hatred of certain communities. The true impact of hate-motivated victimization—the experience of being targeted because of someone’s hatred of one’s identity—is graver than we know. While political leaders may promote these extreme ideologies through speech, there are many documented instances in which followers take that as a call to perpetrate physical violence on the communities they have come to believe are a threat. The vast majority of this violence targets communities of color, religious minorities, and LGBTQ+ people.⁹Federal Bureau of Investigation, “Crime Data Explorer: Hate Crime in the United States,” accessed May 8, 2024, https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/hate-crime. It is important to note that the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) data on hate crimes is likely an undercount because the vast majority of participating law enforcement agencies do not report these data to the FBI. The FBI UCR data were used to understand bias motivations because it contains a breakdown for single bias incidents unlike the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) data, which for all other purposes, is a more complete source of data for hate crime victimization. Across the country, many extremists have committed hate-based violence to make their beliefs known, threatening and harming communities due to resentment about race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or sexuality.

Hate-based violence can occur indirectly or directly and as a single traumatic event or multiple persistent events. Existing research shows that hate crime victims experience emotional distress, nervousness, powerlessness, and isolation.¹⁰Skyler D. Jackson, “‘Connection Is the Antidote’: Psychological Distress, Emotional Processing, and Virtual Community Building among LGBTQ Students after the Orlando Shooting,” Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity 4, no. 2 (2017): 160–68, https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000229.; Jack McDevitt et al., “Consequences for Victims: A Comparison of Bias- and Non-Bias-Motivated Assaults,” American Behavioral Scientist 45, no. 4 (December 1, 2001): 697–713, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764201045004010.; Inter-Agency Standing Committee, “IASC Guidelines for Gender-Based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings,” November 2006, https://www.paho.org/en/documents/iasc-guidelines-gender-based-violence-interventions-humanitarian-settings. Survivors of hate crimes also feel less safe for a more extended period than survivors of non-hate crimes.¹¹McDevitt et al., “Consequences for Victims.”men Individuals from targeted groups are more likely to alter how they navigate their social environments in fear of future victimization.

The trauma from hate-motivated violence reverberates beyond individuals and their communities in the same geographic region. One study found that people who shared an identity with someone they knew who was victimized, or even someone they read about in the media, also experienced feelings of vulnerability.¹²Jenny L. Paterson, Rupert Brown, and Mark A. Walters, “The Short and Longer Term Impacts of Hate Crimes Experienced Directly, Indirectly, and Through the Media,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 45, no. 7 (2019): 994–1010. For example, surveys have shown that shootings motivated by white supremacy have caused direct harm to feelings of safety and security for Black and Latinx people across the country. According to a nationwide Washington Post-Ipsos Poll conducted after the shooting at the Buffalo Jefferson Street Tops supermarket, 75 percent of Black Americans fear that they or someone they love will be physically attacked because of their race.¹³Washington Post and Ipsos, “2022-05-01 Black Americans Trend for Release,” May 1, 2022, https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22055879-2022-05-01-black-americans-trend-for-release. In addition, following the El Paso shooting, Latinx adults were twice as likely as white people to say that they experienced mass shooting-related stress often.¹⁴Monique Noelle, “The Ripple Effect of the Matthew Shepard Murder: Impact on the Assumptive Worlds of Members of the Targeted Group,” American Behavioral Scientist 46, no. 1 (September 1, 2002): 27–50, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764202046001004. These findings illustrate that an act of hate-motivated violence can send the message that all members of the targeted identity group are neither welcome nor safe.¹⁵Noelle; James G. Bell and Barbara Perry, “Outside Looking In: The Community Impacts of Anti-Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Hate Crime,” Journal of Homosexuality 62, no. 1 (January 2, 2015): 98–120, https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.957133. And that is often the point.

Thus, it remains crucial that any discussion of extremism, especially that is borne out of hatred of certain communities, acknowledge and center the grief and pain associated with survivors of extremist violence.

---

II. The Gun Lobby and Gun Industry Fan the Flames of Extremist Ideology

While in recent years there has been significant attention paid to the problems of violent far-right extremism in the United States, the role that the gun lobby and firearms industry plays in exposing mainstream audiences to potentially radicalizing rhetoric has gone under-examined. The rhetoric from the industry and its political allies not only amplifies but actually feeds into extremist conspiracy theory mongering that could lead to violence.

A. Dangerous Rhetoric From Gun Lobby and Industry Risks Extremist Feedback Loop

For many of the most dangerous extremists, those who plan or actually carry out deadly attacks against their perceived enemies, firearms are not just tools to kill or wound. They have integrated gun rights conspiracy theories into their extremist worldview, believing in a supposed all-out assault on gun rights as an element of the totalitarian plot against them. The firearms industry and its representatives in the gun lobby have seemingly sought to leverage the far right’s fervor for firearms for their own financial and political interests. In doing so, they feed into the conspiratorial mindset of extremists, potentially leading to an escalating feedback loop in which the most radical extremists see any effort to regulate firearms as an existential threat deserving of a violent response.

This feedback loop provides a clear logical framework through which we can understand how guns factor into the extremist conspiratorial mindset.

The firearms industry and its representatives in the gun lobby risk an escalating feedback loop in which the most radical extremists see any effort to regulate firearms as an existential threat deserving of a violent response.

As expert J.M. Berger has noted, “[e]xtremism refers to the belief that an in-group’s success or survival can never be separated from the need for hostile action against an out-group.”¹⁶J.M. Berger, Extremism (MIT Press, 2018), 39, https://books.google.com/books?id=M5hnDwAAQBAJ. For those on the far right, their extremist worldview is driven by a series of often overlapping conspiracy theories which lead them to view their in-group, generally white Christian Americans, as facing an existential threat from a shadowy cabal. As Berger writes, “[T]he in-group begins to see the out-group as an unmitigated threat to its legitimacy. The threat creates a crisis, a pivotal event that requires an active response from the in-group. The extremist in-group offers a solution, consisting of hostile actions against an out-group in an effort to resolve the crisis.” […] “To build the narrative of a crisis, real conflicts—such as political disputes or violent clashes between the in-group and out-group—are mixed with imagined or fabricated information.”¹⁷Berger, Extremism, 63-65

Those conspiracy theories often lead extremists to conclude that the cabal has co-opted and compromised the democratic institutions through which they would otherwise seek protection. For example, many white supremacists not only believe that a global Jewish cabal is trying to replace white people in a “genocide,” but that the cabal is in complete control of the world’s governments to carry out the conspiracy. Similarly, anti-government extremists believe agents and institutions of government and those on the political left are subverting democracy to enslave the American people.

This mental framework leads the most dangerous extremists to conclude that violence is inevitable or even justified: if there is no democratic institution to turn to protect the extremist in-group from the existential threat, then force is the only option to respond. This mindset is so foundational to some of the far right that it has been co-opted as a mantra: “There is no political solution.”¹⁸Matthew Kriner, Meghan Conroy, and Yasmine Ashwal, “Understanding Accelerationist Narratives: ‘There Is No Political Solution’ – GNET,” Global Network on Extremism & Technology, September 2, 2021, https://gnet-research.org/2021/09/02/understanding-accelerationist-narratives-there-is-no-political-solution/.

For extremists looking to prepare for or even carry out widespread violence, firearms are the most obvious tool: they are instruments of death whose manufacturers have consistently developed new features to make them even deadlier. Most importantly, they are relatively inexpensive and staggeringly easy to acquire in the United States. The man who shot and killed 10 Black patrons at a supermarket in Buffalo, New York in May 2022 wrote in his 180-page diatribe that he chose to use firearms because “[t]here are very few weapons that are easier to use, accessible, and effective at killing.”¹⁹“Armed Extremism in Buffalo: Online Gun Communities Provide a Path of Radicalization and Training to a Racist Shooter,” Everytown Research & Policy, accessed September 19, 2023, https://everytownresearch.org/report/armed-extremism-buffalo-shooting/.

Marketing to the civilian market by the firearms industry appeals to these desires to obtain efficient killing machines. Far from marketing their products as tools of last resort that carry a heavy burden of responsibility, many in the firearms industry choose to directly raise the specter of war in their advertising targeting civilian consumers. As The New York Times wrote about manufacturer Daniel Defense²⁰David Yaffe-Bellany and David Silver-Greenberg, “Gun in Texas Shooting Came From Company Known for Pushing Boundaries – The New York Times,” The New York Times, May 28, 2022, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/28/business/daniel-defense-rifle-texas-shooting-gun.html.: “By 2009, the company had expanded to making guns for consumers. Its military ties were the basis of its marketing, which often featured heavily armed fighters. ‘Use what they use,’ one ad says. Another shows a military-style scope aimed at passing cars on what looks like a regular city street. Others include references — using hashtags and catchphrases — to the ‘Call of Duty’ video game.”

In these ads, companies regularly feature their products in the hands of warfighters, underscoring to civilian consumers the products’ ability to inflict damage appropriate to a warzone. One notorious ad from Bushmaster promoted one of its assault rifles as “the ultimate military combat weapons system,” warning “Forces of opposition, bow down. You are single-handedly outnumbered.”²¹Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC, “Bushmaster 2010 Product Catalog,” December 1, 2009, https://www.scribd.com/document/40265344/Bushmaster-2010-Product-Catalog. For extremists, especially those who anticipate or eagerly await widespread violence or civil war, these messages can be particularly appealing: if one expects to be fighting a war against the U.S. government, why not “use what they use?”

Indeed, marketing guidance by the industry trade group National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) implies that gun makers could capitalize on distrust within communities and social unrest—including the possibility of further gun restrictions and confiscation—to market their products.²²Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund, “The Gun Industry’s Power Broker: A Closer Look at the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the Front Group for America’s Gun Makers and Sellers,” January 12, 2023, https://everytownresearch.org/report/the-gun-industrys-power-broker-nssf/. Industry market research bares this out. A 2024 analysis by Shooting Industry lists “global unrest” and “domestic politics” as two of the top three drivers to consumers purchasing more guns.²³Rob Southwick & Nancy Bacon, “2024 Industry Outlook,” Shooting Industry, January 2024, available at https://shootingindustry.com/discover/2024-industry-outlook/. More examples of problematic industry advertising are discussed later in this section, but the bottom line is that the industry knows fear-mongering around politics sells more guns.

It is all too common for extremists to not only buy guns, but stockpile arsenals. In their imagining, an existential threat posed to their in-group by a shadowy and often all-powerful cabal requires a response that involves as much violent force as possible. Therefore, in order to respond to the conspiracy against them, they need unfettered access to any and as many firearms as possible.

Once they have concluded that firearms are the tool they need to violently respond to the conspiracy against them, far-right extremists see a new impediment: legal regulation of gun ownership. Given the high stakes, far-right extremists often become ardent opponents of any regulation of firearms ownership. This makes them easy allies with the gun lobby and the gun industry, which for decades have used rhetoric and iconography popular with extremists. The policy preferences of the industry’s trade association—the NSSF—and the largest gun lobby organization—the NRA—are largely identical. For example, both oppose proposals from limits on high-capacity magazines, to background checks on all gun sales, to restriction on assault weapons, to red flag laws to disarm those who might be a risk to their community. 

For decades, the gun lobby has not only advocated for firearms policies that enable extremists to arm themselves, it has spread radicalizing messaging that neatly conforms to the far right’s conspiratorial worldview. In that time, the gun lobby has consistently painted efforts to pass any regulation of firearms ownership as a conspiracy against gun owners and everyday Americans. These conspiracy theories often dovetail with the far right’s own conspiracy theories: most often they allege that there is a conspiracy led by boogeymen ranging from George Soros to the media writ large to strip Americans not only their gun rights, but their right to self-defense altogether.²⁴Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund, “Armed and Dangerous: How the Gun Lobby Enshrines Guns as Tools of the Extreme Right,” September 30, 2020, https://everytownresearch.org/report/extreme-right/. Leaders from the gun lobby then warn that these rights, and the threat of widespread gun violence from citizens, are the only things stopping tyrants-in-waiting from denying all rights. 

Such fear-mongering by groups like the NRA has been crucial to their financial and political strategy. Case Western Reserve University’s Matthew Lacombe has found through analysis of decades of NRA publications that the organization “strategically uses threat to mobilize its members, simultaneously portraying their identity as under attack while also asking them to actively defend gun rights.”²⁵Matthew J. Lacombe, Firepower: How the NRA Turned Gun Owners into a Political Force (Princeton University Press, 2021) 76. One former NRA executive claimed that Wayne LaPierre had put it more plainly behind closed doors: if the organization needed to raise more money, he “would just pour ‘gasoline on the fire’” with more extreme and alarmist rhetoric.²⁶Joshua L. Powell, Inside the NRA (Grand Central Publishing, 2020), 57.

Once an extremist believes the propaganda that any regulation of gun ownership is part of a conspiracy against them, that belief can be easily integrated into the conspiratorial worldview that began the feedback loop. For instance, these ideas are readily integrated into the far right’s other conspiracy theories. In fact, conspiracy theories around gun laws are a foundational element of the anti-government extremist worldview. For white supremacists, efforts to regulate guns are often portrayed as a part of the Jewish plot to dominate Christian Americans,²⁷ADL, “Extremists Exploit Gun Control Issue to Stir Hatred of Jews,” accessed August 31, 2023, https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/extremists-exploit-gun-control-issue-stir-hatred-jews. a view that leaders in the gun lobby have repeatedly gestured toward.²⁸The Associated Press, “NRA Depicts Bloomberg as Octopus, an Anti-Semitic Symbol,” NY Daily News, April 18, 2007, https://www.nydailynews.com/news/nra-depicts-bloomberg-octopus-anti-semitic-symbol-article-1.211274.; Shushannah Walshe, “Glenn Beck Offends Jews By Depicting Mayor Bloomberg in Nazi-Style Salute,” ABC News, May 6, 2013, https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jewish-leaders-glenn-beck-apology-comparing-bloomberg-hitler/story?id=19119684. For example, in 2016, then-longtime NRA board member Ted Nugent shared what the Southern Poverty Law Center described as “a photo collage of a dozen politicians and civic leaders with an Israeli flag and a conspiratorial or hate-filled comment superimposed over each,” claiming that those featured “would deny us the basic human right to self defense & to KEEP & BEAR ARMS.”²⁹Bill Morlin, “Ted Nugent’s Anti-Semitic Posts Drawing Widespread Criticism,” Southern Poverty Law Center, February 9, 2016, https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/02/09/ted-nugents-anti-semitic-posts-drawing-widespread-criticism.

Once the gun rights conspiracy theories are integrated into the existing extremist worldview, they may serve as a further radicalizing element to push an individual closer to violent action. The role that gun rights conspiracy theories serve in radicalizing individual extremists, and the way that rhetoric from the firearms industry and its political allies may help spread and legitimize those conspiracy theories, should be a focus of future attention and scholarship.

B. The Firearm Industry and Lobby Not Only Assail the Enforcement of Gun Laws, Many Support Eliminating All Gun Laws Altogether

In “Armed & Dangerous: How the Gun Lobby Enshrines Guns as Tools of the Extreme Right,” Everytown chronicled the historical symbiosis between the gun lobby and extreme right politics. The NRA utilized the events at Waco and Ruby Ridge in the 1990s to galvanize supporters, demonizing the federal government, especially the ATF, in the process. 

Indeed, recently departed NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre has long vilified the ATF and federal law enforcement, perhaps most infamously penning a 1995 fundraising letter stating “[i]t doesn’t matter to them that the semi-auto ban gives jack-booted government thugs more power to take away our Constitutional rights, break in our doors, seize our guns, destroy our property and even injure or kill us.”³⁰Archives, “NRA OFFICIAL DEFENDS TERMS USED IN LETTER,” Washington Post, May 5, 1995, https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1995/05/01/nra-official-defends-terms-used-in-letter/eb75fcd2-faa9-49b9-8f31-04701763b5a1/. The same letter went on to make reference to Nazi Germany, saying “Not too long ago, it was unthinkable for federal agents wearing Nazi bucket helmets and black storm trooper uniforms to attack law-abiding citizens.” More recently, in 2022, the NRA has alleged the ATF was being “weaponize[d]” against the gun industry, and that “President Biden is trying to make the agency into an anti-Second Amendment wrecking ball.”³¹Mark Chesnut, “The ATF Should’t [sic] Be Political,” NRA America’s 1st Freedom, June 25, 2022.

Messaging from the industry trade group NSSF closely aligns with, if not mimics, the NRA’s. Like the NRA, the NSSF has spread “gun confiscation” conspiracy theories and repeatedly demonized the Biden administration for alleged authoritarianism. In its “fact sheet” denouncing background checks on all gun sales, the NSSF states that the ultimate “goal of registration for antigun advocates is confiscation of law-abiding owners’ firearms,” citing what happened in “Nazi Germany” and echoing NRA claims.³²NSSF, “SO-CALLED ‘UNIVERSAL’ BACKGROUND CHECKS,” NSSF (blog), accessed May 8, 2024.

In fact, many leaders in the gun lobby and industry seem to oppose any and all regulation of firearms, calling all such laws unconstitutional and urging the elimination of the ATF.

In 2021, the NSSF’s Larry Keane was called out for repeating a false claim³³Ali Swenson, “Biden’s ATF Nominee Investigated Waco Raid but Did Not Participate,” AP News, August 30, 2021, https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-823191630494. that David Chipman, a nominee for ATF Director, had been part of the 1993 siege on the Branch Davidian complex in Waco.³⁴Greenberg Jon, “Fact-Check: Was ATF Nominee David Chipman at the Waco Siege of 1993?,” Austin American Statesman, June 1, 2021, https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/politifact/2021/06/01/atf-david-chipman-branch-davidian-waco-tx-fact-check/7491203002/. According to the New York Times, NSSF published a post by Keane “showing a federal agent — falsely identified in a tabloid article as a young Mr. Chipman — standing in the smoldering debris of the Branch Davidian compound.”³⁵Glenn Thrush, “‘This Was a Failure’: Biden’s A.T.F. Pick Says White House Left Him Open to Attack,” The New York Times, September 29, 2021, sec. U.S., https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/29/us/politics/david-chipman-atf.html. While Keane claimed it was a mistake, some may look at that claim with skepticism given the far-right’s long obsession was demonizing the ATF. 

Keane regularly uses inflammatory rhetoric, such as saying that President Biden “would pursue an unconstitutional firearm confiscation agenda” when elected, “ending Second Amendment rights and reducing them to a nanny-state privilege that’s closely monitored and meted out piecemeal to a select few,”³⁶Larry Keane, “NSSF: Take Joe Biden on His Word With Gun Control,” AmmoLand Shooting Sports News (blog), November 10, 2020. and would “weaponize the ATF against retailers to close them down for even minor clerical errors in inspections.”³⁷NSSF, “ICYMI: Biden-Harris Would Weaponize ATF Against Firearm Retailers,” NSSF (blog), October 12, 2020. In reality, the ATF under the Biden administration has pledged to issue notice of revocations to licensed federal firearms retailers that, among other infractions, committed willful violations of federal law, including transferring a firearm to a person legally prohibited from owning a firearm, failing to run a required background check, and falsifying records—hardly “minor clerical errors.”

In fact, many leaders in the gun lobby and industry seem to oppose any and all regulation of firearms, calling all such laws unconstitutional and urging the elimination of the ATF, the federal law enforcement agency responsible for enforcing them. For decades, national gun rights groups like the NRA and their allies in Congress have assailed the ATF, limiting its budget and authority.³⁸Glenn Thrush, Danny Hakim, and Mike McIntire, “How the A.T.F., Key to Biden’s Gun Plan, Became an N.R.A. ‘Whipping Boy,’” The New York Times, May 2, 2021, sec. U.S., https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/02/us/politics/atf-nra-guns.html. Now, many of these groups embrace eliminating the bureau altogether. While he was a member of NRA leadership, then-NRA 1st Vice President Willes Lee regularly called for the abolition of the ATF, statements including:

• “ATF must go. No longer worthless, now a detriment to freedom. These people are sick.”³⁹Willes Lee NRA Board of Directors, “ATF Must Go. No Longer Worthless, Now a Detriment to Freedom. These People Are Sick. #endATF,” Facebook, January 15, 2023.; 
• “How about we just do away w[ith] ATF?”⁴⁰Willes Lee [@WillesLee], “This Is Good. How about We Just Do Away w ATF? #endATF 5 Key Points From The NRA-Backed Pistol Brace Lawsuit | An Official Journal Of The NRA Https://T.Co/X8ErzwNAAJ,” Tweet, Twitter, March 11, 2023.; 
• “Registration leads to confiscation? Could it happen here? IT ALREADY HAS. Don’t let it happen again. (Here’s looking at you ATF.) #destroytheregistry #abolishATF.”⁴¹Willes Lee NRA Board of Directors, “Registration Leads to Confiscation? Could It Happen Here? IT ALREADY HAS. Don’t Let It Happen Again.  (Here’s Looking at You ATF.) #destroytheregistry #abolishATF,” April 3, 2022.

For years, far-right gun rights group Gun Owners of America has called for the abolition of the ATF,⁴²Gun Owners of America [@GunOwners], .“.@antonia_okafor Unloads on the @ATFHQ and Their Bureaucratic Efforts to Unconstitutionally Restrict the Rights of Americans. #abolishtheATF,” Tweet, Twitter, July 27, 2022. with their spokesperson confirming this position in a July 2022 congressional hearing.⁴³KRISHNAMOORTHI: “Thank you, Madam Chair. Miss Okafor, I have a social media post from your Facebook – Instagram – account, the image says, you posted it on June 16th, 2020, here we have the seal of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosions. And, next to it, you said, quote, we said what we said, hashtag GOA, Gun Owners of America, hashtag abolish the ATF. That’s what your post says, correct? OKAFOR: “Correct.” KRISHNAMOORTHI: “Then, underneath your ATF seal, your post says, in big letters, ‘defund.’ Correct?” OKAFOR: “Correct.” “Firearm Manufacturers Testify on Gun Violence,” July 27, 2022, https://www.c-span.org/video/?521853-1/firearm-manufacturers-testify-gun-violence. In 2020, the organization posted a graphic calling for ATF to be defunded “out of existence.”⁴⁴Gun Owners of America [@GunOwners], “Defund the ATF Completely — like out of Existence.,” Tweet, Twitter, June 16, 2020. 

The similarly extreme Firearms Policy Coalition, which has previously sold merchandise to appeal to anti-government extremists,⁴⁵Firearms Policy Coalition, “Get the NEW Boogaloo Shark Tee at [*******].Com,” Facebook, November 21, 2019. has also called for the abolition of the ATF, repeatedly invoking the image of jackboots to compare the ATF to totalitarians. For example, in one tweet, they said that “ATF jackboots […] are far too willing to leverage their immunity and bring violence to peaceable people who simply wish to exercise their natural rights freely. We will not rest until their false ‘power’ is destroyed.”⁴⁶Firearms Policy Coalition [@gunpolicy]. “The ATF Jackboots Have Shown Time and Time Again That They Are Far Too Willing to Leverage Their Immunity and Bring Violence to Peaceable People Who Simply Wish to Exercise Their Natural Rights Freely. We Will Not Rest until Their False ‘Power’ Is Destroyed.” Tweet. Twitter, February 21, 2024.

Advertisements and social media postings from gun industry actors often echo extreme right ideology, in particular anti-government sentiment aimed at the ATF.

Polymer80, one of the largest manufacturers of ghost gun parts, has joined in calls to abolish the ATF.⁴⁷Polymer80 [@Polymer80inc], “@Don’t Forget the ATF!,” Tweet, Twitter, May 24, 2023.

Ammunition manufacturer Fenix Arms, known for advertising that appeals to extremists, has also called for the abolition of the ATF.⁴⁸Polymer80 [@Polymer80inc], “@Don’t Forget the ATF!,” Tweet, Twitter, May 24, 2023. In response to an ATF regulation defining a short-barreled rifle and offering multiple avenues for legally possessing or disposing of such a weapon, the company falsely claimed that “[i]n exactly 8 days, the ATF will be able to murder you inside your own home for refusing to register a weapon you legally purchased months if not years prior. They’re playing chicken with our lives.” Other tweets from Fenix include:

• The claim that the ATF is working with the CIA to arm Mexican cartels,⁴⁹Ian Karbal, “‘Boogaloo’ Believers Think a Civil War Is Coming. These Gun Firms Are Openly Marketing to Them.,” The Trace, June 29, 2020, https://www.thetrace.org/2020/06/boogaloo-gun-ammunition-marketing-facebook/. 
• “The only people terrorizing the community is the ATF. Your goal as an American should be to do as many [things] enforced/controlled by the ATF as you can, on your own, without getting caught.”⁵⁰Feni𝕏 Ammunition [@FenixAmmunition], “The Only People Terrorizing the Community Is the ATF. Your Goal as an American Should Be to Do as Many Enforced/Controlled by the ATF as You Can, on Your Own, without Getting Caught. Distill Your Own Liquor. Grow Your Own Tobacco. Print Your Own Guns.,” Tweet, Twitter, April 19, 2023.

The industry and its allies’ assault on reasonable gun regulations does not stop with abolishing the ATF: many have explicitly stated that they believe all gun laws are unconstitutional. 

In recent years, many in the gun lobby have retreated to increasingly extreme positions, like advocating for civilian ownership of machine guns. This newfound questioning of previously uncontested points of national agreement runs in parallel with the questioning of democratic norms and institutions. Without any gun laws, there would be no legal impediments to convicted criminals or children of any age purchasing firearms.

The gun lobby has not been particularly subtle about this, with their official social media accounts declaring in 2023:

• NRA: “ALL GUN CONTROL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.”⁵¹NRA [@NRA], “ALL GUN CONTROL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.,” Tweet, Twitter, February 27, 2023, https://twitter.com/NRA/status/1630028663168151553. 
• Firearms Policy Coalition: “All gun laws are bullshit.”⁵²Firearms Policy Coalition [@gunpolicy], “@Nunyabidness2a @llHosall All Gun Laws Are Bullshit.,” Tweet, Twitter, July 10, 2023, https://twitter.com/gunpolicy/status/1678219742891343873.
• Gun Owners of America: “Gun control is unconstitutional, and we REFUSE to compromise.”⁵³Gun Owners of America [@GunOwners], “GOA Is the ONLY Gun Lobby to Have Opposed the Undetectable Firearms Act Each Time It Has Received a Vote—in 1988, 1998, 2003, and 2013. Gun Control Is Unconstitutional, and  We REFUSE to Compromise.👏 TAKE ACTION Help Us Fight It Again!,” Tweet, Twitter, July 25, 2023.

Variations of the argument can also be found in various internet memes that circulate in right-wing spaces. Since 1934, the National Firearms Act has regulated machine guns and sawed-off shotguns, among other items. One Instagram post from gun manufacturer Kel-Tec implied that the law should be eliminated, with the caption “Hopefully some day… we’ll be 100% free again.”⁵⁴keltec.official, “Hopefully Some Day… We’ll Be 100% Free Again. #ditchthenfa #american #liberty #gunlawsdontsavelives #stayarmed #theguncollective #keltec #freedom #usa,” Instagram, May 21, 2019.

C. Questionable Gun Industry Marketing References to Extremism and Extremist Narratives/Symbols

Separate and apart from vilification of the ATF and calls to eliminate all gun laws, some gun industry advertisements and social media posts have invoked extremist symbols or ideology. As The New York Times reported in 2022:⁵⁵Mike McIntire, Glenn Thrush, and Eric Lipton, “Gun Sellers’ Message to Americans: Man Up,” The New York Times, June 18, 2022, sec. U.S., https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/18/us/firearm-gun-sales.html. “Gun companies have spent the last two decades scrutinizing their market and refocusing their message away from hunting toward selling handguns for personal safety, as well as military-style weapons attractive to mostly young men. The sales pitch — rooted in self-defense, machismo and an overarching sense of fear — has been remarkably successful.”

The NSSF, the industry trade group, has not condemned such practices and in fact, one high-ranking official dodged the question during congressional testimony. During a July 2022 hearing of the House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform, Christopher Killoy, the CEO of firearms manufacturer Sturm Ruger & Company and an NSSF board member, was asked about the marketing of firearms to extremists. While Killoy said that “we do not tolerate racism or white supremacy,” he refused to condemn industry “marketing to domestic terrorist threats.” He instead demurred on behalf of the industry trade group, claiming that “the National Shooting Sports Foundation does not control individual members’ companies or their ads.”⁵⁶“Firearm Manufacturers Testify on Gun Violence,” July 27, 2022. 3:54:39, https://www.c-span.org/video/?521853-1/firearm-manufacturers-testify-gun-violence.

Hours after the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse, which was celebrated across the gun industry, large firearm retailer and NSSF SHOT Show exhibitor⁵⁷“2022 SHOT Show Planner – Big Daddy Unlimited,” accessed May 8, 2024, https://n1b.goexposoftware.com/events/ss22/goExpo/exhibitor/viewExhibitorProfile.php?__id=2290. Big Daddy Unlimited posted an image on Instagram⁵⁸bigdaddyunlimited, “‘Be a Man among Men..BE UNLIMITED’ Who Would Add This to Their Moral Patch Collection!? Give Us a 👍🏼 in the Comments below! #patch #moralpatch #selfdefense #BDU #BigDaddyUnlimited”,” Instagram, November 20, 2021. of Rittenhouse—portrayed as an “Urban Defender”—with the words “Be a Man Among Men.” As the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform reported, this was a “slogan of the Rhodesian colonist army, which has become a source of inspiration in white supremacist circles.”⁵⁹Chairwoman Carolyn B. Maloney, “The Committee’s Investigation into Gun Industry Practices and Profits,” July 27, 2022, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO00/20220727/115024/HHRG-117-GO00-20220727-SD005.pdf. The firearm retailer reportedly said the meme was created by a former employee who “did not understand the historical significance” of the slogan’s reference, but the company has not removed it from Instagram as of this writing.⁶⁰McIntire, Thrush, and Lipton, “Gun Sellers’ Message to Americans.”

Palmetto State Armory, a large South Carolina-based firearms manufacturer, retailer, NSSF member, and SHOT Show exhibitor,⁶¹“2023 SHOT Show Planner – Palmetto State Armory,” accessed November 14, 2022, https://n1b.goexposoftware.com/events/ss23/goExpo/exhibitor/viewExhibitorProfile.php?__id=1058. began selling a “Big Igloo Aloha” AK-47 with a Hawaiian-shirt-themed paint job associated with “boogaloo” extremists who eagerly plan for a second American civil war. Hawaiian shirts have become the unofficial uniform of these extremists, and “big igloo” is a play on “boogaloo,” their nickname for the anticipated civil war.⁶²Ian Karbal, “A Gunmaker Marketed Anti-Government Boogaloo Products. Then It Lobbied Congress.,” The Trace, March 15, 2021, https://www.thetrace.org/2021/03/palmetto-state-armory-boogaloo-south-carolina-nelson-mullins/.

The company also offered a T-shirt depicting a boogaloo supporter guarding a pile of toilet paper rolls.⁶³Palmetto State Armory, “PSA #ComeAndTakeIt Big Igloo TP Tee Shirt,” accessed May 8, 2024 via Wayback Machine. The shirt may be an attempt to poke fun at pandemic shortages, but it belies the fact that boogaloo extremists have committed multiple murders,⁶⁴The Associated Press, “Alleged ‘boogaloo’ Member Pleads Guilty to Killing Federal Guard during 2020 Protests,” NPR, February 11, 2022, sec. National, https://www.npr.org/2022/02/11/1080311940/alleged-boogaloo-member-pleads-guilty-to-killing-federal-guard-during-2020-prote. participated in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol,⁶⁵A.C. Thompson, Lila Hassan, and Karim Hajj, “The Boogaloo Bois Have Guns, Criminal Records and Military Training. Now They Want to Overthrow the Government.,” ProPublica, February 1, 2021, https://www.propublica.org/article/boogaloo-bois-military-training. plotted the attempted kidnapping of Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer,⁶⁶Ben Collins et al., “Whitmer Conspiracy Allegations Tied to ‘boogaloo’ Movement,” NBC News, October 8, 2020, https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/whitmer-conspiracy-allegations-tied-boogaloo-movement-n1242670. and planned acts of domestic terrorism surrounding 2020’s racial justice protests.⁶⁷Katie Shepherd, “An Officer Was Gunned down. The Killer Was a ‘Boogaloo Boy’ Using Nearby Peaceful Protests as Cover, Feds Say.,” Washington Post, June 18, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/06/17/boogaloo-steven-carrillo/; Newberg, “3 Alleged Members of the ‘Boogaloo’ Movement Charged with ‘Conspiracy to Cause Destruction’ at Las Vegas Protests,” Las Vegas Review-Journal, June 3, 2020, https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/3-alleged-boogaloo-members-charged-in-las-vegas-protests-2044384/. The company has also offered lower receivers, the basic building blocks of AR-style rifles, with “meme” engravings of the Gadsden flag popular with extremists,⁶⁸Brodie, “The Disgraced Confederate History of the ‘Don’t Tread on Me’ Flag,” Washington Post, June 15, 2023, https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2023/06/14/confederacy-dont-tread-on-me-flag/. calls to “Build the Wall,” and “Let’s Go Brandon”—gun parts that, at best, trivialize the seriousness of owning a deadly weapon and, at worst, appeal to political extremists.⁶⁹Palmetto State Armory, “Meme AR Lowers,” accessed May 8, 2024.

In 2018, Florida-based assault weapons manufacturer Spike’s Tactical posted an ad featuring armed civilians staring down a mob of individuals in balaclavas. The ad features the tagline “Not Today Antifa” and lists a number of locations where far-right activists clashed with leftist demonstrators, including the deadly 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. The ad was roundly criticized for seemingly glorifying the far-right extremists at those events, which often included neo-Nazis and white supremacists,⁷⁰Kyle Arnold, “Apopka Gunmaker Catches Flak for ‘Not Today Antifa’ Ad,” The Baltimore Sun, January 11, 2018, https://www.baltimoresun.com/business/os-bz-spikes-tactical-antifa-newsweek-20180110-story.html. but it remains up on the company’s social media accounts as of this writing.⁷¹Spikes Tactical, “Not Today ANTIFA…Not Today. @spikes_tactical & @pipehittersunion #spikestactical #pipehittersunion #antifa #berkley #ucberkley #liberaltears #hatersgonnahate #fuckantifa #thisisntaboutrace #thisisaboutfreedom #commiessuck #socialismsucks #bernie #feelthebern #hillaryforprison #elizabethwarren #socialjusticewarrior #sjw 📸: @straight8photo,” Instagram, January 8, 2018. In fact, the company released the image as a poster amid the uproar.⁷²“Spike’s Tactical Kicks off 2018 with New Marketing Director, Due to Demand, Releases Poster of NOT TODAY ANTIFA Ad – Spikes Tactical,” January 26, 2018.

---

III. Guns Are the Weapon of Choice for the Extreme Right

While similarly situated democracies also face issues with violent extremists, the United States is the only such country that makes it easy for extremists to arm themselves with arsenals of military-style and even untraceable firearms, often without a background check. Extremists continue to take advantage of America’s lax gun laws that allow them easy access to assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, and other weaponry that increase lethality. 

The industry offers a single solution to those who believe the fear-mongering, a solution it just so happens to sell: firearms.

An analysis by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) found that between 2012 and 2022, shootings accounted for three-quarters of the deaths at the hands of extremists.⁷³Center on Extremism, “Firearms Remain the Weapons of Choice for Domestic Extremists | ADL,” June 21, 2022, https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/firearms-remain-weapons-choice-domestic-extremists. A separate Everytown analysis of mass shootings between 2013 and 2022 indicates that 40% of the perpetrators of the 25 deadliest mass shootings were motivated by, or previously expressed support for, white supremacist extremism or violent misogyny.⁷⁴Everytown analysis of the 25 shootings with the highest number of people killed. The shootings with perpetrators that expressed this support were: El Paso, TX; Uvalde, TX; Parkland, FL; Pittsburgh, PA; Santa Fe, TX; Buffalo, NY; Roseburg, OR; Charleston, SC; Dayton, OH; and Cherokee County, GA. 

A. Number of Arrests of Extremists Who Used, Threatened To Use, or Had Ready Access to Firearms Underscores Threat in Recent Years

As discussed above, there have been multiple examples of public research showing the prevalence of the use of guns by extremists in recent years in murders and terror plots. One metric that has gone relatively unexamined is the number of arrests of extremists who use or possess guns while committing an alleged crime or threaten or plot gun violence. Everytown has conducted a non-exhaustive survey of news reports and press releases to identify such cases that were either charged or resolved from 2017 through 2021. 

These arrests were divided into eight different tiers of severity, discussed in greater detail below, which ranged from firing a gun during the commission of a crime to threatening gun violence to illegally possessing a firearm.

The tiers are as follows: 

1. Fired a gun in the commission of a crime
2. Physically menaced others with a gun
3. Committed a crime with a gun on their person or in close proximity
4. Committed a crime while owning a firearm that was not in close proximity
5. Threatened or plotted gun violence while possessing a gun⁷⁵“Possession” in these instances does not necessarily indicate physical possession, i.e. it does not require that the firearm was on the individual’s person at the time of the threat or plot, but that the individual owned a firearm at the time.
6. Threatened or plotted a type of violence that was unspecified or other than gun violence while possessing a gun
7. Threatened or plotted gun violence while not possessing a gun
8. Illegally possessed or sold a firearm

The analysis of these incidents rely on facts alleged in court filings or reported in the media and do not necessarily require gun charges by a prosecutor.⁷⁶For instance, cases in tier six, in which an extremist allegedly threatened or plotted a type of violence that was other than gun violence or otherwise unspecified while possessing a gun, may only involve a gun insofar as the extremist possessed one at the time they considered violence. There may be no gun charges brought in those cases. The cases documented also include crimes, regardless of whether those crimes were determined to be ideologically motivated.⁷⁷For instance, members of a white supremacist gang who possessed guns when they were arrested for drug distribution would be included under the methodology.

In total, 211 arrests of extremists who allegedly used or possessed firearms while committing crimes or threatened or plotted gun violence were identified between 2017 and 2021.⁷⁸This count does not include cases in which a perpetrator died before they could be charged with a crime. That is an approximate average of one case charged every nine days. Between 2017 and 2019, the number of cases decreased significantly from 40 to 23. In 2020, amid widespread civil and political unrest and record increases in firearms sales and deaths,⁷⁹“2020 Brought Highest Rate of Gun-Related Deaths in More Than 25 Years,” Everytown for Gun Safety, May 10, 2022, https://www.everytown.org/press/2020-brought-highest-rate-of-gun-related-deaths-in-more-than-25-years/. the number of extremist gun cases nearly tripled to 66. In 2021, there was a slight decline, but the number remained significantly higher than pre-pandemic years.

Tiers of Extremist Arrests Involving Guns by Date

As previous research has shown, the threat of violence from the far right in recent years has significantly outweighed violence from other extremist movements. This fact is borne out in the extremist arrest data: nearly 85 percent of the cases identified were brought against adherents of the far right. Just over ten percent were Islamist extremists, while the remaining 6 percent of arrestees were far-left extremists. 

Extremists Arrested In Cases Involving Guns by Ideology

The particular danger posed by the far right is also legible in the number of cases in which extremists allegedly committed crimes while wielding firearms or having them promptly accessible, the most dangerous cases, captured in tiers 1 through 3 of the methodology: nearly three-quarters of those cases involved far-right extremists. 

A look at extremists by sub-ideology further illuminates how far-right adherents were most frequently appearing in documented cases: seven in ten of the cases involve anti-government extremists or white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

Extremists Arrested by Sub-Ideology

NOTE: Some extremists had multiple sub-ideologies.

Last updated: 5.3.2024

Below is an examination of each tier in the dataset, the numbers of which are visible in the following graphic.

Tiers of Extremists Arrested in Cases Involving Guns

Tiers 1–3: Alleged Crimes in Which a Gun Was Wielded By or Immediately Accessible to an Extremist

Tier 4: Alleged Crimes Committed By Extremists Who Possessed Firearms That Were Not Immediately Accessible

Tiers 5–7: Alleged Crimes Which Involved Threats of Violence By Extremists

Tiers 5, 6, and 7 all deal with threats or plots of violence. For inclusion in these categories, the threats or plots of violence do not necessarily need to have been criminally charged. Some cases are charging other crimes but there is evidence presented in news reporting or court filings that the extremist made threats or plotted violence. The plots are also not necessarily ideologically motivated: they may be interpersonal in nature, or a mixture of both.⁸⁰For example, Augustus Sol Invictus, a far-right propagandist who spoke at the ‘Unite the Right’ rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, who was arrested for kidnapping and domestic violence on January 17, 2020.

Tier 8: Alleged Illegal Possession or Sale of a Firearm By an Extremist

B. Recent Examples of Armed Extremist Attacks

The past few years have unfortunately provided several additional high-profile examples of extremist violence, or plans for violence, in the United States. Many of those who planned or carried out attacks chose guns as their tools of violence, and some expressed beliefs in dangerous conspiracy theories pushed by the gun lobby.

a. Buffalo Mass Shooting (2022)

On May 14, 2022, a gunman used an assault weapon to open fire at the Tops Friendly Market in Buffalo, New York, killing 10 people and wounding three others. All 10 of those killed were Black, with the gunman specifically targeting a predominantly Black community. This mass shooting was an act of white supremacist, hate-motivated violence.

The Buffalo shooter expressed racist and accelerationist⁸¹Accelerationism is a philosophy adopted by some on the extreme right that view existing institutions in society as irreparably corrupt, and thus encourages adherents to take action to accelerate the downfall of such institutions, and society more broadly. views in various writings. The shooter’s path to radicalization began with his fascination with firearms, particularly on /k/, the 4chan board dedicated to weapons. Everytown explored the shooter’s radicalization in depth in the report “Armed Extremism in Buffalo: Online Gun Communities Provide a Path of Radicalization and Training to a Racist Shooter.” As previously mentioned in this report, the shooter expressly stated that he chose firearms to carry out his attack because “[t]here are very few weapons that are easier to use, accessible, and effective at killing than firearms.” In his writings, the shooter regurgitated some of the most prevalent gun lobby propaganda, including referencing conspiracy theories about the supposedly looming mass civilian disarmament by political elites for the purpose of installing a tyrannical government. When gun extremism fused with his growing white supremacist beliefs, the Buffalo shooter decided to commit mass murder, targeting the Black community in Buffalo. 

b. Allen, Texas Mass Shooting (2023)

On May 6, 2023, a man with longstanding neo-Nazi views killed eight people with an AR-15 assault rifle at an outlet mall in Allen, Texas. The shooter wore a patch emblazoned with “RWDS,” an acronym for “Right-Wing Death Squad,” a logo shared or worn by white supremacists and other far-right extremists.⁸²Hannah Gais et al., “Allen, Texas, Killer Posted Neo-Nazi, Incel Content Online,” SPLC Hate Watch, May 8, 2023, https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2023/05/08/allen-texas-killer-posted-neo-nazi-incel-content-online.

The Allen shooter’s digital footprint leaves no doubt that he harbored hateful racist views.⁸³Everytown obtained, and reviewed, the shooter’s posts from the platform Odnoklassniki (OK) (a Russian social media site that translates to “classmates”) and his activity on YouTube. This includes, but is not limited to, citations to a neo-Nazi website, hand-drawn SS lightning bolts and swastikas, and pictures that appear to show the shooter tattooed with a swastika.⁸⁴Hannah Gais, “Allen, Texas, Killer Posted Neo Nazi, Incel Content Online,” SPLC Hate Watch, May 8, 2023, available at https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2023/05/08/allen-texas-killer-posted-neo-nazi-incel-content-online.Gais et al. The same digital footprint includes deeply misogynistic content as well. 

In addition, the Allen shooter’s writings parrot some of the most infamous rhetoric from the American gun rights movement, including ending one post with the signoff “Molon Labe,” a popular ancient Greek pro-gun slogan roughly translating to “come and take [them],” implying violent resistance to hypothetical gun laws passed democratically. He also shared an article regurgitating the false gun lobby myth that “Democrat leaders support gun confiscation”—a mainstay of NRA messaging for decades.

An analysis of the Allen shooter’s social media history includes a post quoting from an article about the AR-15’s involvement in mass shootings, including that the AR-15 is “the obvious choice for any task that involves killing people at short to medium range.” Indeed, the writings indicate a fascination with mass shootings. For example, he praised the mass shooting at Covenant School in Tennessee, comparing it favorably to the 2014 mass shooting in Isla Vista, California. Like many mass shooters in recent years, the Allen shooter possessed an interest in and admiration for the mass shooter in Christchurch, New Zealand. 

c. The Potential for Rising Antisemitism and Islamaphobia to Lead to Hate-Fueled Gun Violence in the U.S.

The crisis in the Middle East appears to have resulted in a rise in both antisemitic and Islamophobic incidents in the United States.⁸⁵Yang, Maya. “Islamophobia and Antisemitism on Rise in US amid Israel-Hamas War.” The Guardian, November 10, 2023, sec. US news. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/nov/10/us-islamophobia-antisemitism-hate-speech-israel-hamas-war-gaza. Whether this rise in hate-fueled incidents will result in a corresponding uptick in incidents involving guns remains to be seen, but a November 2023 shooting of three Palestinian students in Vermont provides reason for concern. According to reports, two of the victims were wearing Palestinian keffiyehs while walking near the University of Vermont when a white man armed with a handgun shot them.⁸⁶“Three Palestinian Students Shot and Wounded in Burlington”, Everytown for Gun Safety Press Release, Nov. 11, 2023, available at https://www.everytown.org/press/three-palestinian-students-shot-and-wounded-in-burlington-moms-demand-action-and-students-demand-action-respond/. Authorities indicated the shooting was being investigated as a potential hate crime.

As a recent federal arrest involving threats to the Jewish community highlights, antisemitism also continues to be a driver of extremist violence in America.

In June 2023, a man was arrested for allegedly planning a mass shooting at a synagogue in Michigan.⁸⁷Cara Tabachnick, “Michigan Man Arrested for Planning Mass Killing at Synagogue”, CBS News, June 16, 2023, available at https://www.cbsnews.com/news/seann-patrick-pietila-michigan-man-arrested-planning-mass-killing-synagogue/. The criminal complaint⁸⁸United States vs. Seann Patrick Pietila, 1:23-mj-278, June 16, 2023 (W.D.MI). alleges the defendant expressed antisemitic beliefs, admiration for previous extremist mass shooters, and intent to carry out his own mass shooting. After his arrest, investigators found a note on his phone listing a synagogue located in East Lansing, Michigan, a date, and various firearms and weapons, including a firearm converted to be fully automatic.⁸⁹Cara Tabachnick, “Michigan Man Arrested for Planning Mass Killing at Synagogue”, CBS News, June 16, 2023, available at https://www.cbsnews.com/news/seann-patrick-pietila-michigan-man-arrested-planning-mass-killing-synagogue; Dan Basso, “Man Accused of Threatening East Lansing Synagogue Agrees to Plea,” Lansing State Journal, accessed January 10, 2024, https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/local/2023/10/31/threats-east-lansing-synagogue-shaarey-zedek-seann-pietila/71391525007/. In other messages, the defendant discussed his many firearms, which ones he planned to use in his attack, and other violent tactics.⁹⁰United States vs. Seann Patrick Pietila, 1:23-mj-278, June 16, 2023 (W.D.MI).

d. January 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol (2021)

One extreme viewpoint at the forefront of the NRA’s messaging for decades is the insurrectionist theory of the Second Amendment. In 1994, then-NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre summed up the theory when he wrote that the Second Amendment “state[s] in plain language that the people have the right, must have the right, to take whatever measures necessary, including force, to abolish oppressive government.”⁹¹Wayne R. LaPierre, Guns, Crime, and Freedom, 1994, 7. LaPierre put it more plainly years later,⁹²User Clip: LaPierre: Guys with Guns in Charge | C-SPAN.Org (Conservative Political Action Conference, Day 2, Part 1, 2009), https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4937899/user-clip-lapierre-guys-guns-charge. in 2009: “Our Founding Fathers understood that the guys with the guns make the rules.” 

This claim about the meaning of the Second Amendment, dragged into mainstream political discourse by the NRA,⁹³Cummings, William. “For Many Americans, the Second Amendment Is a Defense against Their Own Government.” USA TODAY. Accessed October 23, 2023. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/03/22/many-americans-second-amendment-defense-against-their-own-government/379273002/; Li, Olivia. “The Gun Rights Rhetoric That Helped Seed the Insurrectionist Mindset.” The Trace, January 9, 2021. https://www.thetrace.org/2021/01/gun-rights-rhetoric-insurrectionist-mindset-capitol-trump/. is a corrosive perversion of America’s founding ideals that casts aside democratic consensus and rule of law in favor of rule through fear. Its justification of violence against political opponents, especially when combined with conspiracy theories that claim that those with modestly differing political opinions are in fact tyrants-in-waiting, is a key component in the justification of political violence. There are few instances which more clearly serve as a warning for the violence that can result from this combined mindset of grievance and entitlement than the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.  Indeed, just days after the insurrection, then-NRA Board President Carolyn Meadows reiterated the organization’s embrace of the insurrectionist theory, writing in a column entitled “Why They Fear Us,” that “gun-control advocates want control, but are often stopped because the Second Amendment fundamentally undermines their attempt to turn people into submissive subjects of a controlling state.”⁹⁴Carolyn D. Meadows, “Why They Fear Us,” NRA America’s 1st Freedom, January 19, 2021, https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/content/president-s-column-why-they-fear-us/.

The day started with a rally outside the White House calling for the results of the U.S. presidential election to be overturned. The former president, several allies, and members of his family spoke. Many attendees of the rally then marched to the Capitol where the angry mob quickly became impossible to control. 

The insurrection caused the evacuation and lockdown of the U.S. Capitol. Five people, including an officer from the U.S. Capitol Police, died,⁹⁵Jack Healy, “These Are the 5 People Who Died in the Capitol Riot,” The New York Times, January 11, 2021, sec. U.S., 5, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/11/us/who-died-in-capitol-building-attack.html. and well over 100 members of law enforcement sustained injuries⁹⁶Whitney Wild, “Dozens More US Capitol Police Officers Were Injured on January 6 than Previously Known, Report Says,” CNN, March 7, 2022, https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/07/politics/capitol-police-injuries/index.html.—officers were trampled, struck with a bat, pinned against a statue, hit with a fire extinguisher, sprayed with bear spray, and pushed down stairs, among several other violent acts.⁹⁷Tom Dreisbach and Tim Mak, “Yes, Capitol Rioters Were Armed. Here Are The Weapons Prosecutors Say They Used,” NPR, March 19, 2021, sec. Investigations, https://www.npr.org/2021/03/19/977879589/yes-capitol-rioters-were-armed-here-are-the-weapons-prosecutors-say-they-used.

The Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol succinctly concluded: “Far-right extremists brought guns into Washington or the surrounding area.”

Almost immediately, it became clear that some insurrectionists had arrived in Washington, D.C., or even the Capitol complex, armed. A number were arrested before, during, and after the insurrection on weapons charges. 

The Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol succinctly concluded: “Far-right extremists brought guns into Washington or the surrounding area.”⁹⁸Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, “Final Report,” House Report 117-663, December 22, 2022. These armed insurrectionists included multiple people carrying firearms on Capitol grounds during the melees with police, a man who traveled to D.C. with a cache of guns and ammunition and subsequently texted about “putting a bullet” in Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s head,⁹⁹Man Arrested after Allegedly Texting about ‘Putting a Bullet’ in Nancy Pelosi – CBS News,” CBS News, January 12, 2021, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-allegedly-considering-trying-to-kill-nancy-pelosi-arrested-in-dc/. and a man arrested with a 110-round drum magazine.¹⁰⁰Jennifer Mascia, “A Running List of Gun Arrests Tied to the U.S. Capitol Attack,” The Trace, January 13, 2021, https://www.thetrace.org/2021/01/capitol-riot-firearms-arrests-proud-boys/. Members of the Oath Keepers—now convicted of seditious conspiracy—stored guns at a hotel across the Potomac River for what they called a “Quick Reaction Force” to storm the city,¹⁰¹“The Oath Keepers left their guns stowed away in their cars or across State lines for easy access should they be needed. The group staged a ‘quick reaction force’ across the river in Virginia, amassing an arsenal to come to DC ‘by land’ or ‘by sea,’ as Florida State-chapter lead—and defendant convicted of seditious conspiracy—Kelly Meggs said. Oath Keeper Jason Dolan testified at the seditious conspiracy trial that the ‘quick reaction force [was] ready to go get our firearms in order to stop the election from being certified within Congress.’ Dolan further testified that the Oath Keepers came to Washington, DC ‘to stop the certification of the election. . . . [b]y any means necessary. That’s why we brought our firearms.’” Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, “Final Report,” House Report 117-663, December 22, 2022. and multiple members of the Three Percenter militia movement—now convicted or charged with conspiracy—discussed plans to bring multiple firearms to D.C. in the days before the insurrection.¹⁰²Department of Justice U.S. Attorney’s Office District of Columbia, “Six California Men, Four of Whom Self-Identify as Members of ‘Three-Percenter’ Militias, Indicted on Conspiracy Charges Related to Jan. 6 Capitol Breach,” June 10,2021, 6, https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/six-california-men-four-whom-self-identify-members-three-percenter-militias-indicted; “Former Police Chief Who Defended Himself at Trial Is Convicted of Conspiracy in Jan. 6 Riot,” AP News, July 13, 2023, https://apnews.com/article/alan-hostetter-police-chief-capitol-riot-trial-a24e4f88d2b01dd750f8a958f55a71b8; Twitter, Email, and Facebook, “Jan. 6 Insurrectionist from O.C. Worked to Create Hatchet-Wielding Band of ‘Fighters,’ Faces 20 Years,” Los Angeles Times, April 20, 2023, https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-04-20/la-me-taylor-insurrection-pleads-guilty; The United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia, “Capitol Breach Cases,” February 4, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases?combine=warner; The United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia, “Capitol Breach Cases,” February 4, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases?combine=martinez; The United States Attorney’s Office District of Columbia, “Capitol Breach Cases,” February 4, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases?combine=mele.

Everytown was able to identify at least 12 individuals allegedly tied to the events of January 6 who were arrested in Washington, D.C., and charged with firearms offenses. A review of the police reports related to the insurrectionists showed that police seized at least 3,071 rounds of live ammunition during the course of these arrests¹⁰³Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund, “The Role of Guns & Armed Extremism in the Attack on the U.S. Capitol,” January 28, 2021, https://everytownresearch.org/report/armed-extremism-us-capitol/.—enough ammunition to shoot every member of the House and Senate five times. As one Capitol police officer testified, the number of firearms seized could have been far higher if the authorities had the manpower to detain and search all of the insurrectionists on the way out of the Capitol.¹⁰⁴Holmes Lybrand, “Fact Checking Claims January 6 Was Not an Armed Insurrection | CNN Politics,” CNN, July 28, 2021, https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/28/politics/armed-insurrection-january-6-guns-fact-check/index.html.

Still others invoked guns as the solution to what they saw as the existential threat from a Biden presidency, encouraging others to show up armed.¹⁰⁵OSU-ONDUTY, “RE: ‘Armed and Ready, Mr. President’: Demonstrators Urged to Bring Guns, Prepare for Violence at January 6 ‘Stop the Steal’ Protest in DC,” December 25, 2020, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-J6-DOC-USSS0000038637/pdf/GPO-J6-DOC-USSS0000038637.pdf. Posts online from users discussing plans to bring guns to the Capitol were so plentiful that the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department posted signs warning that firearms were legally prohibited on the National Mall.¹⁰⁶Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, “Interview of: Robert J. Contee III,” January 11, 2022, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-J6-TRANSCRIPT-CTRL0000036624/pdf/GPO-J6-TRANSCRIPT-CTRL0000036624.pdf. Even after the fact, insurrectionists bemoaned the fact that more hadn’t been carrying guns¹⁰⁷Elizabeth Dias and Jack Healy, “For Many Who Marched, Jan. 6 Was Only the Beginning,” The New York Times, January 23, 2022, sec. U.S., https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/23/us/jan-6-attendees.html. and ominously promised to return with them.¹⁰⁸Chris Joyner, “Georgia Attorney Held without Bond in Capitol Attack,” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, January 21, 2021, https://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-attorney-held-without-bond-in-capitol-assault/ASNAE3SKKRBDNCYQH36UOZ6S5M/; Kevin Krause, “Dallas Man Who Threatened ‘Traitors’ after Capitol Riot Is First North Texan to Be Sentenced,” The Dallas Morning News, October 21, 2020, https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2021/10/21/dallas-man-who-threatened-traitors-after-capitol-riot-is-set-to-be-first-north-texan-sentenced/.

The insurrectionists at the Capitol were armed, organized, and violent. Apart from the physical presence of guns, the strong ties of several of the insurrectionists to gun extremism is hardly surprising—guns are a recruiting and motivating tool for the extreme right. Conspiracy theories about election rigging and the “stolen” election, driven by a deep state of shadowy government actors, echoed the same imaginary threats the gun lobby has parroted for years to motivate gun rights absolutism around the supposed looming confiscation of guns by the government. 

C. Armed Demonstrations Continue to Pose a Threat to American Democracy

In August 2021, Everytown and the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) released a first-of-its-kind report examining the rise of armed demonstrations since 2020: events at which demonstrators, counter-demonstrators, or other individuals or groups were present and carried or brandished firearms. Given the remaining threat posed by armed demonstrations, this monitoring has continued to the present day and now encompasses some 52 months of data.

Throughout 2020, images and accounts of armed people, often in tactical gear, flooded the public consciousness. Armed individuals showed up at demonstrations against pandemic-related public health restrictions. As demonstrations for racial justice spread nationwide in the wake of the murder of George Floyd, armed counter-demonstrators, often motivated by far-right conspiracy theories, appeared at public events, adding a potentially deadly element to the events. The largest spike in armed demonstrations in the past four years coincided with the backlash to racial justice demonstrations: there was an average of more than five armed demonstrations every day in June 2020. 

Later in 2020, the claims by then-President Trump and his allies of a stolen election led to dozens of armed “Stop the Steal” demonstrations. These events were especially alarming in light of the fact that two-thirds of “Stop the Steal” demonstrations took place at government buildings, including locations where votes were being tabulated. The frequency of these demonstrations dropped significantly after the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

Thankfully, the number of armed demonstrations, both in terms of raw numbers and as a proportion of all demonstrations, has remained relatively low since 2021. Between January 2020 and April 2024, there were more than 60,000 public demonstrations in the U.S. Of those, at least 778 demonstrations included the presence of an armed individual, other than law enforcement. 

Percentage of All Demonstrations That Were Armed

However, there is still cause for concern. For one, while armed demonstrations represent a small proportion of the total number of events, armed demonstrations are seven times more likely to be violent or destructive than unarmed demonstrations. While armed demonstrations account for less than 2% of the total number of demonstrations in the US, they account for more than 10% of all violent or destructive demonstrations. 

That trend is mirrored in which events turned deadly. The 778 armed demonstrations since 2020 have resulted in more fatalities than all of the fatalities at the nearly 60,000 other demonstrations in that same time combined. 

Second, even when no shots are fired, the presence of armed demonstrators is in and of itself a show of violent intimidation which can chill free speech and expression. Research has shown that Americans are less likely to attend demonstrations to exercise their free speech rights if they knew civilians at the event were armed.¹⁰⁹Diana Palmer and Timothy Zick, “The Second Amendment Has Become a Threat to the First,” The Atlantic, October 27, 2021, sec. Ideas, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/10/second-amendment-first-amendment/620488/. One poll found that 60 percent of Black and White Americans said they would be “very unlikely” to attend such a demonstration.¹¹⁰Alexandra Filindra, “Many Now Worry about Gun Violence at Demonstrations,” Washington Post, November 21, 2021, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/11/21/americans-do-not-want-guns-protests-this-research-shows/.

Third, while there has been a relative decline in the number of armed demonstrations since the highs in 2020, the circumstances and conditions which both enabled and caused those increases in armed civilians at demonstrations persist in 2024. 

Most notably, lax firearms laws still make it far too easy for extremists, including those with criminal histories, to arm themselves and show up in public spaces carrying firearms. For example, most states have not yet regulated the open carry of firearms,¹¹¹Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund, “Which States Regulate the Open Carry of Firearms?,” accessed August 31, 2023, https://everytownresearch.org/rankings/law/open-carry-regulated/. leaving extremists able to legally appear at events openly carrying firearms.

Repeatedly since 2020, spikes in armed demonstrations were accompanied by the adoption and advancement by right-wing leaders of the narratives motivating the demonstrations.

In addition, American political leaders are still leveraging extremist narratives and conspiracy theories in an effort to secure their power. In doing so, they lend legitimacy to extremist movements, pushing those that have already been radicalized closer to violence.¹¹²Daniel Byman, “How Hateful Rhetoric Connects to Real-World Violence” (Brookings Institution, April 9, 2021), https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-hateful-rhetoric-connects-to-real-world-violence/. Repeatedly since 2020, spikes in armed demonstrations were accompanied by the adoption and advancement by right-wing leaders of the narratives motivating the demonstrations. 

For example, the 2020 Stop the Steal movement that led to violent armed demonstrations, including the January 6 insurrection, was the result of then-President Trump’s insistence on the false claim that he had won the presidential election. Former President Trump continues to make the same claims and deploy incendiary rhetoric in the face of criminal proceedings, raising the obvious potential that a violent movement could reignite.

Even in the case that old narratives and movements do not resurface to stoke armed demonstrations, recent months have shown the ways that novel extremist narratives could lead to a spike. As multiple studies have concluded, 2022 saw a marked increase in targeting and harassment of LGBTQ+ people by the far right, spurred on by dangerous rhetoric from right-wing leaders.¹¹³Sam Jones and Roudabeh Kishi, “UPDATE | Fact Sheet: Anti-LGBT+ Mobilization in the United States,” ACLED (blog), November 23, 2022, https://acleddata.com/2022/11/23/update-fact-sheet-anti-lgbt-mobilization-in-the-united-states/; Tim Squirrell and Jacob Davey, “A Year of Hate: Understanding Threats and Harassment Targeting Drag Shows and the LGBTQ+ Community” (Institute for Strategic Dialogue), accessed August 31, 2023, https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/a-year-of-hate-understanding-threats-and-harassment-targeting-drag-shows-and-the-lgbtq-community/; “Year in Review: Anti-LGBTQ+ Hate & Extremism Incidents, 2022 – 2023”, Anti-Defamation League and GLAAD, June 22, 2023, https://www.adl.org/resources/report/year-review-anti-lgbtq-hate-extremism-incidents-2022-2023. This real-world activation is visible in a concerning rise in armed anti-LGBTQ+ demonstrations starting in June of that year, coinciding with Pride month.¹¹⁴Camille Petersen, “‘It Feels More Urgent’: LGBTQ Community, Security Experts Worry about Rising Violence amid Pride Events – ABC News,” ABC News, June 23, 2023, https://abcnews.go.com/US/feels-urgent-lgbt-community-security-experts-worry-rising/story?id=100274448. 

In one instance in June 2022, a ‘Pride in the Park’ demonstration in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, was confronted by multiple groups of counter-demonstrators, some of whom were armed.¹¹⁵Odette Yousef, “Idaho’s Fight against the Far Right, Then and Now,” NPR, June 27, 2022, https://www.npr.org/2022/06/27/1106828549/idahos-fight-against-the-far-right-then-and-now. Members of the white supremacist group Patriot Front were arrested by police as they arrived on the scene before they could engage with any demonstrators.¹¹⁶Kaye Thornbrugh, “New Details Emerge about Patriot Front Arrests,” Coeur d’Alene/Post Falls Press, June 15, 2022, sec. News, https://cdapress.com/news/2022/jun/15/new-details-emerge/. In a March 2023 incident, white supremacists, some of whom were armed, demonstrated against a drag show in Ohio. The extremists shouted “Heil Hitler” and racial slurs and multiple violent confrontations were reported.¹¹⁷Will Carless and Doug Livingston, “Nazi Salutes, Pepper Spray and Pistols: Ohio Drag Event Devolves into an Extremist Melee,” USA TODAY, March 14, 2023, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/03/14/drag-storyelling-in-wadsworth-ohio-devolves-into-extremist-fight/11465959002/.

In the year between June 2021 and May 2022, anti-LGBTQ+ demonstrations accounted for just 3 percent of all armed demonstrations. In the subsequent 12 months, from June 2022 through May 2023, anti-LGBTQ+ demonstrations accounted for nearly one-third of the total, making such activations the most common motivation for armed demonstrations during that period. 

Anti-LGBT Demonstrations As Percentage of All Armed Demonstrations

Last updated: 5.3.2024

The degree to which such demonstrations became more common in conjunction with rising anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric from right-wing leaders underscores the way that extremist rhetoric can spur real-world violent action, suggesting that extremists remain primed to respond to similarly motivating propaganda narratives by showing up armed in the real world. This raises the concerning possibility that right-wing leaders could deploy similarly motivating narratives in the future, which can sometimes form around a single event, leading to another spike in armed demonstrations. 

---

IV. Conclusion

Given the current political environment, the threat of escalating far-right extremist violence in America is real. Political leaders continue to leverage the far-right propaganda and radicalizing conspiracy theories that animated political violence on January 6, 2021 to convince supporters that the stakes for those opposed to any and all gun regulations are even more dire and more existential.

While the majority of the country sees January 6 as a day where far-right demonstrators went too far, there is a portion of the country that believes the rioters on January 6 didn’t go far enough. One doesn’t need to travel to dark corners of the internet to find such sentiment—public polling confirms it, with one survey finding 14 percent of people believing “in the next few years, there will be civil war in the US”, and 19 percent of respondents believing “having a strong leader for America is more important than having a democracy.”¹¹⁸Garen J Wintemute, “Views of American Democracy and Society and Support for Political Violence: First Report from a Nationwide Population-Representative Survey”, July 19, 2022. The same survey found 5.5% of Americans surveyed believed political violence was justified “to return Donald Trump to the presidency”—a percentage that may seem low, but which indicates millions of Americans share this anti-democratic and violent belief set. This is a group whose propensity to violence can be supercharged by easy access to guns. 

Meanwhile, the firearms industry has positioned itself to profit from the embrace of political and hate-motivated violence by a concerning number of Americans. The industry and its lobbying apparatus fights for laws that enable extremists to arm themselves while simultaneously doing all it can to ratchet up the fear and anger that motivates extremists. The industry then offers a single solution to those who believe the fear-mongering, a solution it just so happens to sell: firearms. 

Guns are the weapons more frequently used by extremists in perpetrating violence, yet many policymakers, journalists, and academics create artificial silos in discussing extremism and guns. This is a missed opportunity, primarily because common sense gun policies, supported by the majority of the American public, could significantly reduce the threat of armed extremism in America. These policies include: 

Stronger gun safety laws will not end hate or extremism, but policy can be effective in making extremists less deadly. Such reforms face steep resistance from America’s gun lobby and gun industry. This is hardly surprising; armed extremism in America is enabled and amplified by extreme rhetoric and extreme policy positions of the gun lobby and gun industry.